<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" ><channel><title>MyBlogSG.com &#187; PageRank</title> <atom:link href="http://myblogsg.com/tag/pagerank/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://myblogsg.com</link> <description>My Thoughts on Wat&#039;s Up Around Me</description> <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 12:38:57 +0000</lastBuildDate> <language>en</language> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>SPH-Search.com is Better</title><link>http://myblogsg.com/sph-searchcom-is-better/</link> <comments>http://myblogsg.com/sph-searchcom-is-better/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 04:00:54 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Wassup</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Wassup]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Google]]></category> <category><![CDATA[PageRank]]></category> <category><![CDATA[SPH Search]]></category><guid isPermaLink="false">http://wassup.myblog.sg/2008/04/15/sph-searchcom-is-better/</guid> <description><![CDATA[Found out that this crappy domain, SPH-Search.com has PR2. In terms of Google PageRank, SPH-Search is better than SPHSearch.com, SPHSearch.com.sg and SPHSearch.sg which currently ranked at PR1. SPH Search registered these domains and launched them much earlier than SPH-Search.com. Logically, SPHSearch.sg should have better than PR1. Why did SPH not link it&#8217;s high PR site [...]]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>Found out that this crappy domain, <a href="http://www.sph-search.com">SPH-Search.com</a> has PR2. In terms of <strong>Google PageRank</strong>, SPH-Search is better than <span id="more-61"></span>SPHSearch.com, SPHSearch.com.sg and SPHSearch.sg which currently ranked at PR1.</p><div align="center"> <a href="http://www.seochat.com/seo-tools/pagerank-lookup/" target="_blank"><img src='http://cloudfront.myblogsg.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/04/sphsearch_pagerank_001.jpg' alt='SPH-Search.com PageRank 14 Apr 2008' /></a></div><p>SPH Search registered these domains and launched them much earlier than SPH-Search.com. Logically, SPHSearch.sg should have better than PR1.</p><p>Why did SPH not link it&#8217;s high PR site such as SPH.com.sg, AsiaOne.com, Zaobao.com and StraitsTimes.com to SPHSearch.sg?</p><p>Maybe they did but screwed up in the process.</p><p>Maybe SPHSearch.sg would improve in the next Google PageRank update.</p><p>Maybe they were too busy dancing&#8230;</p><div align="center"> <iframe title="YouTube video player" class="youtube-player" type="text/html" width="425" height="344" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/O-bMxhcJ8M8" frameborder="0" allowFullScreen="true"> </iframe></div><p><div style="text-align:center"><script type="text/javascript"><!--
google_ad_client = "pub-3169393782861942";
/* wassup.myblog_336x280single */
google_ad_slot = "1091554011";
google_ad_width = 336;
google_ad_height = 280;
//--></script><script type="text/javascript"
src="http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/show_ads.js"></script></div></p> ]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://myblogsg.com/sph-searchcom-is-better/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using apc
Object Caching 298/342 objects using apc
Content Delivery Network via Amazon Web Services: CloudFront: cloudfront.myblogsg.com

Served from: myblogsg.com @ 2012-02-08 21:46:46 -->
